Follow Us On:
Welcome to Ford Forums! Have an account? or Register!
Remember me
Login or register to hide this ad.

8 plug 2.3l vs 4 plug 2.3l

This is a discussion on 8 plug 2.3l vs 4 plug 2.3l within the Engine & Drivetrain forum, part of the Ford Tech Support category; hey there, due to some aviation background i know the difference between having one plug per cylinder and 2 plugs. ...

Do you like this thread? Tell your friends:
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Unread 01-31-2012, 04:46 PM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 26
Credits: 904
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rep Power: 0
thunderbuggy88 is on a distinguished road
8 plug 2.3l vs 4 plug 2.3l

hey there, due to some aviation background i know the difference between having one plug per cylinder and 2 plugs. the plane feels like it loses all power when you lose just one plug out of 2 per cylinder. now based on that im wondering if the benefits are the same in the ford 2.3l engines. i have a 1988 thunderbird turbo coupe with a 4 plug 2.3l. will a 8 plug head fit on this block and, if so, will i benefit power wise? are there any major valve differences or cam differences between the heads?

ive heard also that the intake bolt pattern was changed slightly which would really make things difficult is this true?
__________________
not a mechanic, but a guy who learns and lets others learn from his lessons.

Last edited by thunderbuggy88; 01-31-2012 at 04:58 PM.
thunderbuggy88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Don't want to see these ads? Register for a FREE Account. (Will hide text links in first post as well.)
Want to Advertise on Ford Forums Online? Read our Advertising Information
Unread 01-31-2012, 05:02 PM   #2
Senior Member
Canuck623's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 1,000
Credits: 15,480
Thanks: 91
Thanked 325 Times in 226 Posts
Rep Power: 25
Canuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond repute
It will probably fit but you will have to swap over lots of other electrical stuff to make it work. The 8 plug has 2 modules, 3 crank sensors, 2 coils. You get the picture. Everything from the PCM to the plugs would have to be changed. Oh and no noticeable power increase would be felt. That was JUST for emissions and nothing else.
__________________
2005 Ford Thunderbird
2005 Ford Focus
2004 Sport Trac
1965 F100
2008 Honda Goldwing
Ford Master Tech with 40 years in the business
Canuck623 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-01-2012, 09:30 AM   #3
Moderator
phantom's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Pochatoula.La
Posts: 549
Credits: 9,128
Thanks: 25
Thanked 74 Times in 57 Posts
Rep Power: 8
phantom is a name known to allphantom is a name known to allphantom is a name known to allphantom is a name known to allphantom is a name known to allphantom is a name known to all
Send a message via Yahoo to phantom
I second that ,there are plenty of other more cost worthy options out there for more power.
__________________
12 Ford Focus SE
96 Ford XLT Lariat
93 Ford Festiva modified
92 Ford Festiva stock
68 Ford Mustang GT 428CJ
Small Time Skates board,Independent trucks,autobahn wheels and abec 7 bearings
phantom is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-03-2012, 08:55 AM   #4
Super Moderator
mark v's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Brookfield, WI
Posts: 2,071
Credits: 31,898
Thanks: 78
Thanked 109 Times in 94 Posts
Rep Power: 11
mark v is a splendid one to beholdmark v is a splendid one to beholdmark v is a splendid one to beholdmark v is a splendid one to beholdmark v is a splendid one to beholdmark v is a splendid one to behold
The 2 plug engines were for emissions. Believe my I has one in my 1989 Ranger and it was slow as hell.
__________________
Mark V

1998 Windstar GL (New Axle)
1998 Explorer
2011 Edge SE
1978 Honda CB750K (free bike but I need a title)

RockAuto Forum Discount http://www.fordforumsonline.com/forum/ford-forums-online-announcements/announcement-5-discount-code-rockauto-com.html

mark v is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-09-2012, 06:13 AM   #5
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 42
Credits: 737
Thanks: 2
Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts
Rep Power: 0
MichaelJennnings will become famous soon enough
Originally Posted by mark v View Post
The 2 plug engines were for emissions. Believe my I has one in my 1989 Ranger and it was slow as hell.
You are right about it being an emissions thing for the dual plugs. It didn't do much for performance at all. Just allowed for a leaner mixture is all. Very similar engineering idea to the old rotary engines in the Mazdas. I loved to freak people out by connecting the coils directly to the primary plugs set the point gap and start the engine with no distributor caps. Nobody could figure it out until I explained what the second plug was for.

As for retrofitting a dual plug system onto a single plug engine, not worth the money or the headache. Plus, the ECM for the car would not work correctly. The calibrations would be off. This isn't like in the old days of dropping a V-8 into a car that had a I-6. With all of the electronics, emissions equipment let alone the emission laws, it isn't worth anything.
MichaelJennnings is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-09-2012, 08:20 AM   #6
Senior Member
Canuck623's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 1,000
Credits: 15,480
Thanks: 91
Thanked 325 Times in 226 Posts
Rep Power: 25
Canuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond reputeCanuck623 has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by MichaelJennnings View Post
You are right about it being an emissions thing for the dual plugs. It didn't do much for performance at all. Just allowed for a leaner mixture is all. Very similar engineering idea to the old rotary engines in the Mazdas. I loved to freak people out by connecting the coils directly to the primary plugs set the point gap and start the engine with no distributor caps. Nobody could figure it out until I explained what the second plug was for.

As for retrofitting a dual plug system onto a single plug engine, not worth the money or the headache. Plus, the ECM for the car would not work correctly. The calibrations would be off. This isn't like in the old days of dropping a V-8 into a car that had a I-6. With all of the electronics, emissions equipment let alone the emission laws, it isn't worth anything.
Yup your right....everything I said a week or so ago but you used way more words so you win!!!
__________________
2005 Ford Thunderbird
2005 Ford Focus
2004 Sport Trac
1965 F100
2008 Honda Goldwing
Ford Master Tech with 40 years in the business
Canuck623 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Canuck623 For This Useful Post:
Dominick (02-09-2012)
Reply


Tags
23l, plug

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off