Follow Us On:
Welcome to Ford Forums! Have an account? or Register!
Remember me
Login or register to hide this ad.

How-To: Pull Diagnostic Codes OBD-1 Pre-1996 Fords

This is a discussion on Pull Diagnostic Codes OBD-1 Pre-1996 Fords within the Engine & Drivetrain forum, part of the Ford Tech Support category; Pull Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs) From your onboard computer. Your engine and transmission are computer controlled. The computer uses sensors ...

Do you like this thread? Tell your friends:
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Unread 04-03-2010, 06:04 AM   #1
Super Moderator
Poppy's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,216
Credits: 41,593
Thanks: 568
Thanked 342 Times in 277 Posts
Rep Power: 34
Poppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond repute
Pull Diagnostic Codes OBD-1 Pre-1996 Fords

Pull Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs) From your onboard computer.
Your engine and transmission are computer controlled.
The computer uses sensors to tell it a number of different things and it controls actuators that push or pull mechanical levers (kinda). If one or more sensors aren't working properly, the computer goes "blind" and doesn't know what to do. If the computer can "see" but one of the actuators is broken and therefore can't follow the commands of the computer; the engine won't run correctly. The computer is preprogrammed with set values for each of its sensors, and each of its actuators. It will run a self check of all systems, like the space shuttle; it will compare its set value(s) to the value(s) it recieves from its sensors, and actuators. If any sensor or acutator is out of the "normal" range the computer will generate a "code." It will generate some codes on the fly, and others will be stored while you are driving. There is a simple method to "pull codes" out of the computer for one to use for diagnostic purposes.
Earlier versions of On Board Diagnostics OBD 1983-1995 can flash the error code to the dash board and can be pulled in one's driveway without any special tools.
Later versions of On Board Diagnostics OBDII some 1995, and pretty much all 1996 and newer, require one to use a code reader or scanner tool.
Some auto parts stores will scan your engine codes for FREE, you may want to call around. Some will scan OBDII but not the older (prior to 1996) OBD systems.
SO here you go...
How to scan FORD on board Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTCs) in your driveway

HowTo Pull Codes 1983-1995 Broncos, Mustang, F series Trucks, Econolines, 302, 351 and more
__________________
My grandkids call me Poppy!

Caveat Emptor, I'm not a mechanic, I just play make believe, here. Consider any and all of my suggestions with that in mind.

Last edited by Poppy; 04-03-2010 at 06:11 AM.
Poppy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Poppy For This Useful Post:
D.Acker (10-16-2010), Robert44 (10-26-2010)
Sponsored Links
Don't want to see these ads? Register for a FREE Account. (Will hide text links in first post as well.)
Want to Advertise on Ford Forums Online? Read our Advertising Information
Unread 06-15-2010, 08:48 AM   #2
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10
Credits: 393
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
dogsharks is on a distinguished road
Again, thanks for the education, I'll print this off and study it.

One thing you mentioned caught my eye, and both times when the 351W decided to die on me, I was shifting the automatic transmission. First time I had shifted from highway running to 4WD low range to climb a long driveway, second time I was climbing a long hill at around 45 mph and decided to manually shift into second gear just to give the motor a break, and shortly thereafter it began to cough. Thankfully on that second time I had crested the hill and was able to coast through the stop sign (after carefully looking both ways, no cars anywhere to be seen) and coasted all the way down to a nice safe place.

I'll read through the info and we'll be taking the Bronco out for a test run. After replacing what I did so far, she started up nicely as soon as the filter was full. I am going to cut that old filter in half just to look. It is all drained now as I've had it set out for a couple days to be sure.

regards,

Dogsharks
dogsharks is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-16-2010, 08:42 PM   #3
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5
Credits: 256
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
richierick is on a distinguished road
Poppy your link is busted and doesn't work.

Poppy,

Finally thought that I found a solution to my problems with my 1992 Taurus on-board diagnostics, but was very disappointed that your link to the broncozone.com Driver Error failed.

What a waste of time.
richierick is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-16-2010, 08:55 PM   #4
Moderator
electro's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 921
Credits: 519
Thanks: 100
Thanked 134 Times in 76 Posts
Rep Power: 16
electro has much to be proud ofelectro has much to be proud ofelectro has much to be proud ofelectro has much to be proud ofelectro has much to be proud ofelectro has much to be proud ofelectro has much to be proud ofelectro has much to be proud ofelectro has much to be proud ofelectro has much to be proud of
Rich, check back in a day or two. I'm sure either the link will work or supplemental information will be available.
electro is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-17-2010, 08:21 AM   #5
Senior Member
Boghog's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,182
Credits: 3,274
Thanks: 41
Thanked 259 Times in 182 Posts
Rep Power: 20
Boghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant future
Here you go ,courtesy of Ford Fuel Injection.

Ford Fuel Injection » How To Run a Self-Test
__________________
Your vehicle is like your wife.Spend some money on them once in a while and they won't nag you to death.

Their Sacrifice....Our Freedom
Boghog is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-17-2010, 12:28 PM   #6
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5
Credits: 256
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
richierick is on a distinguished road
Thanks Boghog. Your informative webpage is just what I was looking for. Have performed the EEC code tests.

The test codes I obtained were a little confusing, but I'm sure can be meaningfully interpreted. The codes were only three in number plus the cylinder balance test result:

111 System checks OK


172 (R,M) Oxygen sensor not switching - system is or was lean - Single, Right orr Rear HO2S - Fuel control (HEGO – Heated Exhaust Gas Oxygen sensor HEGO circuit indicates system lean (right side))


176 (M) Oxygen sensor not switching - system is or was lean Left or Front HO22SSS - Fuel control (HEGO – Heated Exhaust Gas Oxygen sensor HEGO circuit indicates system lean (left side))

Cylinder Balance Test read #9 No Problems

Are there two Heated Exhaust Gas Oxygen sensors, one on the left side(of what?) and one on the right side(of what?)?

If the system checks out OK, and the cylinder balance test showed no problems, then why would the codes, 172 & 176, for the HEGO have even registered?

I'm trying to resolve the problem with my 1992 Taurus, because I just failed a state emissions test due to high Nox emissions of 2708ppm actual versus 878ppm state mandated max limit. Just looking at the results that I received doing the EEC test, I don't understand why only HEGO results were obtained, since nothing seems related to Nox emissions. Would a HEGO sensor failure cause the Nox emission to read high like I have experienced?

If you can give me some held in understanding these EEC test results that I've obtained in light of the high Nox emissions failure result during the state inspection, would be appreciated.
richierick is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-17-2010, 02:32 PM   #7
Senior Member
Boghog's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,182
Credits: 3,274
Thanks: 41
Thanked 259 Times in 182 Posts
Rep Power: 20
Boghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant futureBoghog has a brilliant future
Well the heated O2 sensors are left for the left bank of cyls and right for the right bank of cyls.This way the PCM can monitor how each side of the engine is running.The 2 codes you supplied 172 and 176 are telling you that the left and right bank of cyls are running lean.Meaning not getting enough gas to meet the 14.1 ratio the computer is looking for.This is usually cause by a vacuum leak going to the intake,an example would be a cracked or disconnected vacuum hose.Sometmes the intake manifold gasket can loosed up from vibration and allow excess air to enter.because both of these leaks are after the MAF sensor the computer does not recognize them as added air to the system.This is also the reason that your NOX readings are higher than normal.Nox is a byproduct of combustion and is used to lower cobustion chamber temperatures in the quench are of the cyl through the EGR process.You might try spraying some carb cleaner around the vacuum lines and intake manifold and see if the RPM increases.If it increases look in that area for your leak.
__________________
Your vehicle is like your wife.Spend some money on them once in a while and they won't nag you to death.

Their Sacrifice....Our Freedom
Boghog is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Boghog For This Useful Post:
electro (10-19-2010)
Unread 10-23-2010, 05:43 PM   #8
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5
Credits: 256
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
richierick is on a distinguished road
1992 6cy Taurus 3.0 Diagnostic Codes

Hello Poppy,

I was having a high Nox emmission output, ran the diagnostics as you suggested and got codes 172 and 176 for HEGO lean conditions right and left sides. I replaced both Oxygen Sensors, and drove the car about 25 miles, before trying to read the diagnostic codes again. Didn't get the codes 172 and 176 again, but I'm not sure what I did get. On the KOEO test, seems like I got 111, but it didn't repeat, and then appeared to receive some random numbers that didn't repeat either.

Poppy, how much driving is necessary before the cars computer will report the correct codes during the KOEO and the KOER tests?

Also, will reported codes always repeat a second time?

WHy would I receive a code 111 reported twice indicating system is ok, but also receive other codes that are also reported twice?
richierick is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-23-2010, 05:54 PM   #9
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 5
Credits: 256
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
richierick is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by Boghog View Post
Well the heated O2 sensors are left for the left bank of cyls and right for the right bank of cyls.This way the PCM can monitor how each side of the engine is running.The 2 codes you supplied 172 and 176 are telling you that the left and right bank of cyls are running lean.Meaning not getting enough gas to meet the 14.1 ratio the computer is looking for.This is usually cause by a vacuum leak going to the intake,an example would be a cracked or disconnected vacuum hose.Sometmes the intake manifold gasket can loosed up from vibration and allow excess air to enter.because both of these leaks are after the MAF sensor the computer does not recognize them as added air to the system.This is also the reason that your NOX readings are higher than normal.Nox is a byproduct of combustion and is used to lower cobustion chamber temperatures in the quench are of the cyl through the EGR process.You might try spraying some carb cleaner around the vacuum lines and intake manifold and see if the RPM increases.If it increases look in that area for your leak.
Hello Boghog,

I decided to replace both of the Oxygen Sensors on my 92 Taurus. After doing so, I found a failed vacuum hose, only about 2 inches long, that goes to the EGR intake I think, and replaced it. Anyway, I will be returning to have the car retested for emissions on Monday.
richierick is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-23-2010, 05:55 PM   #10
Super Moderator
Poppy's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,216
Credits: 41,593
Thanks: 568
Thanked 342 Times in 277 Posts
Rep Power: 34
Poppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond repute
I don't know the answer to how long of a drive cycle does it take to clear the codes.
In the tutorial it tells how to clear the codes, by pulling the jumper as it is sending codes.

Remmeber that the first 111 is for the KOEO codes, the next set of codes that are displayed are Continuous memory codes. So you can get a 111 for the on demand codes, but still have codes stored in CM. The last set of codes would be your KOER codes with the engine running

Whenever you change a component that will affect the fuel air ratio, you are supposed to pull the negative battery cable for at least 10 minutes to clear the fuel trims. That will also clear out the CM codes.

I'd pull the battery cable and run it for a few days and see if the codes return.
Good job!
__________________
My grandkids call me Poppy!

Caveat Emptor, I'm not a mechanic, I just play make believe, here. Consider any and all of my suggestions with that in mind.
Poppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-23-2010, 06:03 PM   #11
Super Moderator
Poppy's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,216
Credits: 41,593
Thanks: 568
Thanked 342 Times in 277 Posts
Rep Power: 34
Poppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond repute
Originally Posted by richierick View Post
Hello Boghog,

I decided to replace both of the Oxygen Sensors on my 92 Taurus. After doing so, I found a failed vacuum hose, only about 2 inches long, that goes to the EGR intake I think, and replaced it. Anyway, I will be returning to have the car retested for emissions on Monday.
LOL.. I guess we were both typing at the same time.

The vacuum leak was most likely your problem, and the sensors were just reporting the leak.
In a '92 I think the O2 sensors were supposed to be changed every 30,000 miles or so, so I'd bet that they were over due.
__________________
My grandkids call me Poppy!

Caveat Emptor, I'm not a mechanic, I just play make believe, here. Consider any and all of my suggestions with that in mind.
Poppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-26-2010, 12:33 PM   #12
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2
Credits: 250
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
richie65 is on a distinguished road
Hello Poppy,

This is richieric. Had to reregister on the website for some reason. Wouldn't recognize me. New ID is richie65. Wanted to let you know that my Taurus passed the state emission inspection Monday. It does look like the problem was that 2" piece of vacuum hose that had a 1" hole burned in it. If I had found the failed hose, I probably wouldn't have had to replace the O2 sensors, and saved some money. Oh well, I guess that's just life, huh?

Got one question tho. Altho I passed the emissions test, my Taurus emissions are still 300+ for the Nox. Max allowed is just 870. Why is my Nox reading 300+ on my 92 Taurus, while the Nox readings on my 95 Contour and my 95 Mustang only read less that 50?
richie65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-26-2010, 06:59 PM   #13
Super Moderator
Poppy's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,216
Credits: 41,593
Thanks: 568
Thanked 342 Times in 277 Posts
Rep Power: 34
Poppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond reputePoppy has a reputation beyond repute
Hmm, That's interesting that you were ABLE to log on with a new screen name.
I'll talk to our admin about that. You may find that in the future you will only be able to log in with on screen name or the other.

Sorry... *I* can not help you with the NOX question. Hopefully someone else can. but don't be too surprised if some of these posts get deleted, because this is a HOWTO thread, not a help me with my problem thread.
__________________
My grandkids call me Poppy!

Caveat Emptor, I'm not a mechanic, I just play make believe, here. Consider any and all of my suggestions with that in mind.
Poppy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Poppy For This Useful Post:
Ashzo77 (10-26-2010)
Unread 09-12-2011, 02:06 PM   #14
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 3
Credits: 481
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
biggestfordfan is on a distinguished road
is there anywhere one can buy the diagnostic machines to pull error codes? I mean regular folks, not certified mechs.

thanks in advance.
biggestfordfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-12-2011, 03:12 PM   #15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Parkersburg Wv.
Posts: 3,081
Credits: 45,752
Thanks: 692
Thanked 484 Times in 375 Posts
Rep Power: 32
Dominick has a reputation beyond reputeDominick has a reputation beyond reputeDominick has a reputation beyond reputeDominick has a reputation beyond reputeDominick has a reputation beyond reputeDominick has a reputation beyond reputeDominick has a reputation beyond reputeDominick has a reputation beyond reputeDominick has a reputation beyond reputeDominick has a reputation beyond reputeDominick has a reputation beyond repute
Code readers
Dominick is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Dominick For This Useful Post:
Poppy (09-12-2011)
Unread 01-14-2012, 03:01 PM   #16
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10
Credits: 732
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
coloradohoosier is on a distinguished road
Thanks for sharing that, Poppy. Sitting in the driver seat reading codes is easier than standing in front of the van trying to do it with a cheap code reader, particularly for someone who hasn't done it very often and has trouble keeping 2 and 4 second pauses straight.

My 93 E250 5.8 did give me trouble reading the KOER codes though ---- it never gave me the four flashes to tell me to hit the brake, turn the wheel and hit the OD button. It just started sending codes --- and it sent one, 998 (hard fault present) that is supposed to come in the KOEO codes.
coloradohoosier is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-15-2012, 01:59 PM   #17
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Nashville,TN
Posts: 12
Credits: 583
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rep Power: 0
bootjack is on a distinguished road
great info... but for me the KOER test was a bust...... CEL and code reader immediately went to flashing a 998 code.... no engine ID code ...so now what?? CEL has been on for about 4 months but passed emissions test last week. KOEO test gave me a 111 code then a 224 under CM output.

92 Ranger, 2.3 L dual plug, EEC-IV, DIS...
bootjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diagnostic test leads Boghog Electrical & Lighting 1 02-27-2011 08:03 PM
Obd diagnostic interface elm 327 loup0204 Ford Ranger 1 10-25-2010 11:01 AM
Truck Pull BoomDiggity Ford F-Series 2 08-27-2010 12:41 AM
Reference: Vin and Certification Codes 1996-1999 royesses Ford Explorer 2 04-29-2010 09:30 PM
Definition: Diagnostic Trouble Code Boghog Engine & Drivetrain 0 04-03-2010 02:19 PM

Tags
codes, diagnostic, fords, howto, obd1, pre1996, pull

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off