I've been looking at tires for the Milan, and i'm getting somewhat annoyed. It seems to me, if you look at any one brand, in a given size, for the Milan it's 225/50-R17, any type of tire will be around the same price! Why is that? Summer tires are not an option in the Minnesota climate, so i'm looking at some kind of All Season. So then you have Passenger All Season, Performance All Season, High Performance All Season, Ultra High Performance All Season, Touring All Season and Grand Touring All Season. All for about the same money. OEM tires would cost me over $800, and i was hoping to sacrifice some performace (since the wife is driving it now and she doesn't care) for some savings. But for any of those types of All Season tires, we're looking at saving no more than $100 for the set. I'm really confused. The difference is so small between each type. Why bother? They might as well just make one kind of "Performance" All Season and call it good! Why FIVE different kinds?! And as for tread life, the Good Year tires we have on it wore out quicker than those on our Fusion (same size wheel and tire, OEM Michelins). The Good Years have lasted under 30,000 miles, while the Michelins have almost 60,000 on them. I don't want to pay 2/3 the price for half the tread life! As I recall, that's what the Good Years cost. I know the value of getting what you pay for, and the cheapies, at around $120-170, all have really low tread wear ratings, so that sounds to me like that's asking to need tires again in a couple of years. And that leaves me back where I started with my $800 OEM tires. Frustrating.