Ford Automobiles banner
1 - 16 of 16 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Hello,

This is going to be a very long posting when it's all finished, so I thought it would be best to have its own thread rather than buried in one of my car already terribly long threads.

I realize this is probably beyond the average person, but I wanted to post to show what's involved in case anyone should really want to try, of which I fully encourage and will gladly answer any questions.

Since this will be a long posting I should start with an overview of what this will entail. First is the rebuilding of the factory 1968 AM-FM Stereo radio for ford full size. Then I'll show what I intend to upgrade as far as the rest of the audio system for the car.

My goal for the car (1968 XL fastback) is to have everything stock looking on the inside of the car and use the original radio but upgrade the rest of the system so it sounds much much, much, did I mention much, better than the 6 watts rms it had when it left the factory.

I'll say this, the radio I chose to rebuild had a great deal wrong with it and was very time consuming and probably represents a worse case scenario.

Table Picture frame Engineering Wood Automotive design


I'm starting with 2 spare radios I procured off of Fleece-Bay over the years for the 1968. To the best of my knowledge only 1968 full size fits 1968 full size and nothing else. Finding one takes time as the AM-FM radios of the 3rd gens were the second most expensive option on the cars and not very common.

Font Music Parallel Pattern Paper


This is the schematic for the AM and FM front end as well as the power supply section.

Font Material property Parallel Pattern Paper


The last page of the schematic shows the stereo decoder (demultiplexer) and the L & R amplifiers, about all 3 watts per channel of them. :rolleyes:

Circuit component Electronic component Electronic engineering Hardware programmer Electrical wiring


I chose this one of the two because it was the cleanest and no other reason.

Now for those who might have investigated repairing older electronics you may have heard to replace all the electrolytic capacitors first type of mantra going around.

I'm going to take a different approach, mostly because I want to efficiently repair the radio. With that I will power it up and make notes of what is wrong then diagnose atop of what is already likely faulty or failing capacitors as the radio will have to come mostly apart and I wish to repair as much as possible the first time around.

When I powered it up on the bench, I found AM completely dead, the volume was severely attenuated on FM to the point where it was nearly full volume on the knob to get ambient listening level out of the speakers. The left channel is crackling and the stereo lamp doesn't appear to be glowing on any FM stereo station. Oh and the manual tuning knob is just slipping and doesn't move the dial hardly at all.

So lets start with the AM portion first.

Schematic Font Parallel Rectangle Diagram


The plan is to first inject a 400 Hz tone where I have it in red ink to see if the signal is even getting to the amplifiers. If that works then divide the AM radio into 3 sections as indicated in green numbers circled and check for signal at those points.

Control panel Audio equipment Electronic component Electronic engineering Electrical wiring


For the 400 Hz signal, any signal generator will do. If you have one of those 15 dollar kit signal generators it'll work just fine for this test, just isolate with a 0.01uF capacitor to protect your gear.

Circuit component Electricity Electronic engineering Electrical wiring Electronic instrument


With that I do have the 400 Hz tone at the point on the schematic.

Schematic Font Parallel Rectangle Diagram


Since I know the signal is getting through at the red inked line the AM-FM selector switch is working. With that I'm going to attach an antenna again and check location one with a spectrum analyzer to check to see if the local oscillator is running. You can use a scope at this point and I would short out the antenna if you do as noise and stations coming in will muddy your local oscillator sine wave.

Using a spectrum analyzer will show the quality and amplitude of the local oscillator and with an antenna will show any station or noise at 262.5 kHz (1st IF transformer) as well.

Circuit component Passive circuit component Hardware programmer Electronic component Computer hardware


Measuring point.

Oscilloscope Engineering Gas Machine Electronic device


And the local oscillator is running at 985 kHz and there is a signal, be noise or a station at 262.5 kHz.

Ok, the front end of the AM radio is working.

Schematic Font Parallel Rectangle Diagram


At point 2.) I should see a greater amplitude 262.5 kHz than at point 1.) and the local oscillator will be tuned out by the first IF transformer so that's all we should see.

Oscilloscope Measuring instrument Engineering Machine Display device


And there it is. So the first IF amplifier is working as well. This particular model spectrum analyzer has a built in AM and FM detector. If I switch on the AM demodulator, put the cursor atop the 262.5 kHz peak and turn up the volume on the spectrum analyzer I get the AM station the radio was tuned to. If I manually move the dial on the radio the AM portion is working just fine to this point.

Schematic Font Parallel Rectangle Diagram


So the AM radio works up to point 2.) next is to check point 3.)

Continued in next post.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #2 ·
Radio Diagnostics Continued

Oscilloscope Electronic engineering Engineering Machine Electronic device


At point 3.) the signal is attenuated greatly and below the conduction threshold of the detector diode, hence no output on the radio. I checked the diode and it checks fine (diode check on a multimeter) and I checked that C65 is not shorted and it wasn't. So next I checked the resistance on the IF transformer.

Passive circuit component Circuit component Hardware programmer Electronic instrument Electronic component


Checking the primary coil of the last IF transformer.

Audio equipment Musical instrument accessory Musical instrument Electronic instrument Machine


8.3 ohms. Yeah I have newer multimeters but I do like the vintage stuff when appropriate to use. These old nixie tube Flukes are from 1968 and are spot on calibration wise and never had a problem with either of them.

Anyway, the schematic calls out 7.5 ohms, but I'm using a 2 wire resistance measurement so the resistance of the leads is adding to the real value some. The primary is fine.

Green Circuit component Audio equipment Motor vehicle Wood


Measuring secondary.

Musical instrument Musical instrument accessory Keyboard Audio equipment Electronic instrument


It's open. Well there's the reason why AM is dead.

Product Font Schematic Parallel Pattern


Now I know when I take the radio apart I'll remove this IF transformer and see if I can't repair the broken winding. Now if I listened to the internet <big sigh> I would have taken the radio apart, replaced all the electrolytic's then put it all back together, only to have to take it apart again to fix this. Once you better see what it takes to take apart and put back together you'll really understand why it's important to diagnose first what you can, before you attempt any repairs.

Onto the FM stereo portion and giving it a once over to see why the FM radio is alive but not the stereo lamp.

This operation does require some specialized kit.

Audio equipment Control panel Gauge Gas Technology


In this case I am using a Sencore SG-165. Sencore did make a more modern version of this it's an SG 80 I believe. There are also some other brands. I have a Leader stereo generator as well, but it doesn't have all the functionality of this Sencore. The big problem with older test gear is that often it's either out of calibration so much it's not useable or it's failed and out of calibration to boot. Then it costs even more to repair and get it to the point of using. I've already went through and rebuilt this Sencore and calibrated it.

How this works; with this function selected, it will generate an FM station frequency based on the setting of the big round dial (88-108MHz) and then you can manually turn on the stereo pilot and also the left and/or right speaker test tone. The output of this is fed into the antenna of the car radio and you tune the car radio dial to whatever this is set at station wise, or vise versa, doesn't matter. Then you can turn on the stereo pilot frequency of which should turn on the stereo lamp but otherwise the speakers should be silent and then you can turn on the left speaker or the right speaker test tone or both to check stereo separation.

Electrical wiring Electronic engineering Electricity Engineering Art


So here's the setup, since both amplifiers in this radio are so neutered (way less than 1 watt) I am using the Fluke multimeters to measure the AC signal across the speakers. I have the car radio tuned to the stereo generator.

Audio equipment Font Gas Electronic instrument Electronic device


I have the stereo pilot on and the right side speaker tone on.

Musical instrument accessory Musical instrument Electronic instrument Audio equipment Electrical wiring


I have right side speaker with a decent amount of separation. There's a little on the left.

continued in next post.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Radio Diagnostics Continued

Audio equipment Font Gas Control panel Technology


Selecting the stereo left side speaker tone.

Musical instrument accessory Audio equipment Electrical wiring Electronic engineering Electronic musical instrument


Decent stereo separation, so the decoder is working, but not the stereo lamp.

Circuit component Passive circuit component Hardware programmer Electricity Electrical wiring


Next obvious step is to measure voltage at the lamp as maybe the bulb has simply failed.

Schematic Rectangle Font Parallel Map


Well I only get 2.3 volts for a 12 volt bulb. If I put my peeper right up to the amber jewel on the radio I can see a hint of glow in a dark room. I doubt the stereo decoder is so far out of alignment as to cause the dim lamp because it has pretty good stereo separation still. I bet it's the transistor or R70 or both even.

So now I know to pull and check that transistor and resistor.

Ok that hits all the key areas of the standard AM-FM stereo. I realize I'm skipping a lot and if there are questions on how FM stereo works or even how AM works (AM is real simple) I'll be more than happy to delve into it. Oh there was one more thing I failed to mention, the radio will not shut off. It's a physical problem with the On/Off Volume control. For whatever reason, it's stuck on and will not click off.

At this point, we can take apart the radio with a rational solid repair plan.

You really want to take copious amounts of pictures taking intricate items like this apart. This is true if there are many wires that must be unsoldered.

Here's some of the more interesting pictures.

Circuit component Green Passive circuit component Hardware programmer Electrical wiring


This is one of the output amplifiers. It's a TO3 standard package, but geeze these look like the TO3 prototypes.

Motor vehicle Combat vehicle Automotive design Self-propelled artillery Engineering


It starts getting unruly pretty quick.

Motor vehicle Wood Gas Auto part Machine


There's the other channels amplifier output transistor. I've worked on a lot of vintage electronics and I've never seen this rendition of a TO3 till now. Learn something new every day.

Circuit component Electronic instrument Hardware programmer Computer hardware Electronic component


Almost there.

Circuit component Electronic instrument Electrical wiring Audio equipment Computer hardware


That little board flipped up is the entire AM radio portion. The remainder large 'L' shaped bottom board is the FM and stereo decoder. AM radios are very simple and very open if you take off the top and very easy to work on. This is antithesis of that.

Ford offers integrated 8 track but with AM radio only for 1968. Now you know why. There's no bloody room for an 8 track player with the FM stereo portion.

Circuit component Passive circuit component Hardware programmer Electrical wiring Audio equipment


This may look scary at this point, but if you take your time and loads of pictures it's not. There's no need to take this apart further. So we'll stop here and start the long road to recovery on the next round.

More to come.

Cheers
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
Radio Repair Part I

I'll start with the easy peasy mechanical stuff first. I'll address the slipping manual tuning.

Gas Wood Engineering Machine Audio equipment


The manual tuning has a little clutch assembly. There's basically a flywheel, if you will, friction disc and a little pressure plate.

Wood Tool Burin Gas Saw


Here's the parts stack up.

Wood Auto part Cable Wire Fashion accessory


The friction disc is, or was, a piece of serrated rubber that turned hard due to age. This needs to be replaced.

Watch Motor vehicle Gauge Wood Clock


First, will be to estimate its original hardness. This is a Shore A gauge and so we can assume it originally was under 70 shore A.

Table Wood Eyewear Gauge Magnifier


I have two sheets of EPDM rubber to choose from; 50 A or 60 A rubber. You can buy these at McMaster. I choose the 60 A rubber sheet that came in under the rating a bit.

Watch Office ruler Clock Gauge Rectangle


The original disc measures 0.049"

Watch Clock Font Gauge Gas


The replacement is ~0.059" There is an adjustment on the fork for the little pressure plate so a slightly thicker piece of friction material will work.

Gas Tool Wood Circle Composite material


Since the replacement sheet was smooth, I used a very course sandpaper to scratch radial lines on one side of the friction and roughed up the pressure plate with finer sandpaper. I also glued the friction disc to the flywheel so there's only one side to slip on.

Circuit component Passive circuit component Motor vehicle Hardware programmer Automotive tire


Cleaned and greased (white lithium) the manual tuning knob and reinstalled.

Circuit component Musical instrument Electronic engineering Audio equipment Hardware programmer


Adjust the tension on the pressure plate and it works like new, no more slipping manual tuning knob and the preset buttons disengage the clutch fully when pressed. Cross that off the list.

Continued in next post.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
Radio Repair Part I - Continued

Motor vehicle Electronic engineering Engineering Electrical wiring Gas


Next is the light insulation from the stereo lamp to the front jewel. It just disintegrated into dust. Plus this gives me a chance to clean and lube the pointer and band selection mechanical portions.

Passive circuit component Circuit component Hardware programmer Electronic instrument Electronic component


I repainted the dial needle the correct orange.

Wood Machine Auto part Cable Automotive exterior


The stereo lamp looked low hours, but since this is pain to replace, I put a brand new old stock bulb in.

Automotive lighting Fluid Tap Cylinder Liquid


Wood Gas Machine Automotive wheel system Automotive design


I had to get creative with the missing light pipe foam. This is a roll of generic medium density EPDM foam.

Wood Gas Auto part Metal Kitchen utensil


I had to use two layers, but I round punched out this and stacked them.

Circuit component Tableware Passive circuit component Dishware Hardware programmer


I carefully cleaned the dial face and directly lit the stereo lamp to check if the foam seal worked. It did very well, no ambient stray light into the jewel except the stereo lamp.

The old turd of a radio is starting to clean up nicely.

Circuit component Electronic instrument Eyewear Electronic component Electronic engineering


As you can see you need to have a lot of work space for something like this.

OK next up is the volume control -On/Off switch. It won't mechanically switch off.

Circuit component Gas Passive circuit component Electronic component Auto part


I removed the back switch off the volume/tone control assembly and found the contact slightly bent. I simply straightened it and put it back on. That fixed that. I also sprayed control cleaner into the assembly since I was there.

That takes care of the mechanical problems. Now onto the more interesting electrical ones.

Circuit component Wood Electrical wiring Electronic component Toy


This is the AM radio board. Not much too it. In the diagnostic section I found the secondary winding of the 2nd IF transformer open. The IF transformers are in these tall metal cans for shielding against radiant electrical noise. I will unsolder the entire can, then remove the insides for inspection.

Continued in next post.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
Radio Repair Part I - Continued

Circuit component Electronic component Gas Asphalt Electrical wiring


This is the actual IF transformer assembly. Here you can see the primary and secondary windings separated by an air gap. They are not wound atop one another like you would probably see in a power transformer or audio transformer. In the plastic base are the small mica tubular capacitors as shown on the schematic. Together with the inductance from the windings and the capacitance this forms a tuned circuit which peaks at 262.5 kHz when adjusted. What you can't also see are two ferrite tuning slugs, one under each coil. They screw up and down the centre tube changing the resonant frequency. These are the slugs you adjust when electrically aligning the radio.

Back to the problem at hand. The terminals look extremely corroded. Let's have a closer look.

Output device Bicycle handlebar Automotive mirror Gadget Cameras & optics


Well, there's the problem. However this begs the question why did the solder and copper wire oxidize so badly and only at the terminal.

Fortunately there is enough slack in the copper windings to reattach. However all that corrosion must be carefully and meticulously removed first. I can't use chemicals without damaging the rest of the assembly. It was a painfully tedious slow scraping to remove as much corrosion as I could.

What happened here is actually pretty simple. Someone on the assembly line making these used a solder with an acid core base and not rosin core. The acid will slowly oxidize the joint over time but look just fine right after soldering initially.

Wood Gas Flooring Machine Auto part


And here it is repaired.

Computer Output device Product Gadget Gesture


Computer Output device Product Personal computer Gadget


You get the idea. I redid all the connections in this transformer and removed as much of the corrosion as I could. I use 3% rosin core solder and sometimes use no clean rosin flux liquid on stubborn areas. All these are safe long term on connections.

There's a high probability that even my other parts radio has the same problem so trying to find a usable part may prove to be very difficult if not impossible. So sometimes you have to make difficult repairs.

Now even though the 1st IF transformer was working I was worried it might have the same problem only to rear its ugly head later.

Sooooooooooo

Purple Tableware Barware Drinkware Flooring


I pulled that off the AM board and pulled it out of the can.

Output device Computer Television set Gadget Flat panel display


This is what I've found. Factory fresh 50+ year old solder that looks like it was just soldered. This person on this assembly line used the correct rosin core flux solder. No worries here.

This will fix the AM band.

Much more to come.

Cheers
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 · (Edited)
Radio Repair Part II

I need to include a few things I've forgotten to comment about. There's a condition for a certain kind of silver mica capacitor in the IF transformers that causes either a dead AM/FM band, or poor sensitivity or even poor selectivity. Sensitivity is receivers ability to receive a weak station. Selectivity is the receivers ability to focus in on one station. Too little selectivity can result in a side or adjacent station bleeding over into the station your tuned into. Too much selectivity can reduce signal bandwidth and cripple fidelity.

Back to the point. If the IF transformer has the capacitor where it's a sheet of mica plated with silver on both sides to form the capacitor and it's squeezed by contacts in the plastic base of the IF transformer this can be a problem and those need to go and be replaced with a regular silver mica encapsulated capacitor.

What happens in these IF transformers, is with time/age and use the plating of silver is so thin on the mica sheet with contaminants such as humidity and salts from the air, the current and voltage across the capacitor will start to lift the ions of the silver around the contact and it will plate the contact. When enough of them have migrated over the connection to the rest of the mica capacitor can be lost or lost intermittently. If you hear crackling on the speakers either intermittently or all the time, there's a high probability this is the cause. On vacuum tube/valve radios because of the higher voltages, you can see this type of capacitor arcing if you can look into the IF transformer either through the bottom or top with the set running. It makes one of hell of a racket on the speaker(s) when doing so.

This radio doesn't use those kinds of capacitors in the IF transformers, they are round mica ones with leads so it's not a problem.

OK that's a good segue onto electrolytic capacitor replacements.

Unfortunately, just like automotive parts, the electronic parts industry has, over the years, been plagued especially with cheap crappy parts or even counterfeit parts that look like brand name parts. These parts are junk and to be avoided.

You can give yourself the best chance to avoid counterfeit parts by ONLY buying from places like Digikey, Newark, Mouser, Allied, etc. These places do their very best to vet the parts they buy and sell. When you buy parts from radio supply houses, parts clearance houses or E-Bay or Amazon there's no guarantee and most likely those are either plain junk or counterfeit parts, which are also junk.

The primary brands of capacitors to stick to are:

1.) Panasonic
2.) Nichicon
3.) Sprague which is now owned by Vishay
4.) Illinois Capacitor

There are other brands like Kemet that are ok, but try to stick to these when possible for your application.

If you see a no name capacitor or a funny name one, just say no. :)

That covers the quality and supplier topic of capacitors, now lets cover the actual electrical characteristics of capacitors.

In a perfect world a capacitor has no series resistance, no parallel resistance and no series inductance. But they do. Electrolytic capacitors especially. There are all kinds of different classes of capacitors; electrolytic's, film, disc, mica, variable plate air, tantalum, etc. Here I am just going to discuss the problems with electrolytic's.

Electrolytic's are simply two rolls of conductive foil separated by an insulator soaked in a juicy and often toxic electrolyte. How's that for a sandwich :)

As a result of its construction, electrolytics have a service life in hours (most often from 1000 hours to 10,000 or more hours). The life depends on the temperature of which it operates and the quality of the materials used.

Here's some of the failure modes of electrolytic capacitors.

1.) The electrolytic paste-goo dries up and the capacitance goes way down, sometimes to near zero.
2.) The dielectric insulating film between the foil sheets can break down causing shorts between the two sheets of foil.
3.) The dielectric paste-goo can eat away at the foil causing the equivalent resistance of the capacitor to go way up or the dielectric breaks down causing the delayed dielectric effect to increase resistance.
4.) The dielectric paste-goo can turn caustic and eat away at the aluminum can structure then leak out of the capacitor, not only rendering the capacitor inoperative but then eat away at the traces on the PCB board around the capacitor. This happens in equipment, consumer goods and now even happening in ECU's in cars from the 80's and 90's. Fox body guys are starting to feel this with the Ford ECU's and so are the imports of that era. I bet some thought they never would have to recap their ECU's....... :(

I know that was a lot for a beginner, so I'll stop there and let that soak in.

The main characteristics of interest for a capacitor for uses like this are series resistance, capacitance and parallel resistance. Parallel resistance is also called leakage resistance of a capacitor and isn't so much a factor in a bi-polar transistor radio such as this, mostly because bi-polar transistors are a current device and even a slight leakage in a coupling capacitor probably will not greatly affect the Q (quiescent) point of the bias of the transistor.

However if it's a FET radio or a vacuum tube/valve radio even a slightly leaky coupling capacitor can cause high currents in FET's and even red plate tubes causing them to fail.

To further compound the complexity of capacitors, certain test equipment can test falsely to really screw with you. I'll demonstrate this and why it's just best to replace nearly all old electrolytic capacitors when in doubt.

Let's jump in.

I've removed all the electrolytic's from the radio. I'll start testing the two off the AM board.

Schematic Font Rectangle Parallel Engineering


These two are circled in blue and green on the schematic.

Motor vehicle Hood Audio equipment Electronic engineering Gas


This is the 50 uF capacitor circled in blue. This is the AVC/AGC (automatic volume control/automatic gain control) capacitor in an AM radio. If this were to open (dry out) your AM radio would squeal over most or all the band.

OK, onto testing. I have a little handheld capacitance meter here first. The rating on the capacitor is only 50 uF. If this is all you had, you might think this is an over achiever and is still good. At this point I wish I could insert Dr. Cox's wrong song from Scrubs. :p

Audio equipment Electronic engineering Machine Electronic device Engineering


Here's the same cap on a lab grade LCR bridge. It's a little high, but not terribly. So what's going on here and why is the capacitor still bad.

Well it's about the ESR or equivalent series resistance. Imagine there is a resistor in series inside the capacitor. Ideally the series resistance should be 0 ohms, but in reality for a capacitor like this it should be 1/2-1 ohm, 2 ohms max.

Now from the D or Q reading we can use some simple trig to calculate ESR.

Electronic instrument Electronic engineering Audio equipment Machine Engineering


Or just press the ESR button and it does it for you. So 14 ohms is way too high. This capacitor is still alive, but it's dying and very much on its way out.

So why does the handheld capacitance meter read nearly twice the rated capacitance?

I should note it isn't because the handheld is some cheap thing, I've seen way overpriced Fluke handheld multimeters with a capacitance function give the same B.S. result.

The answer is simply how it measures capacitance. The handheld meters are applying a charging voltage to the capacitor and integrating that over time to calculate capacitance. What happens when the series resistance goes up..... it takes longer to charge the capacitor and fools the meter into thinking it's a larger capacitor than what's actually connected.

The big LCR bridge is using frequency applied across the capacitor to determine is true capacitance and that method is unaffected by any resistance.

There's the reason why. Hopefully that makes sense.

Bird's eye chili Body jewelry Spice Fish Fashion accessory


Lets test the other capacitor on the AM board. This is the filter capacitor in the AM B+ supply and is circled in green.

Schematic Font Rectangle Parallel Engineering


Audio equipment Motor vehicle Gas Electronic instrument Engineering


I'm going to keep using both meters to show how easily it is to be fooled.

So this is saying it's 26.1 uF and it's rated at 20 uF. So that seems good, or does it....

Audio equipment Electronic engineering Engineering Electronic device Machine


Oh my it's real value is 0.246 uF. It's dead. Nobody home. Why did the handheld read nearly ok then.

Electronic component Audio equipment Electronic engineering Engineering Electrical wiring


Because the ESR is really high at 1.3k ohms. By sheer dumb luck the tiny residual capacitance this had left and the high ESR it had fooled the handheld into thinking it's close to the rated value.

Having this capacitor open and running in a car with all the electrical load noise would have probably made it next to impossible to listen to AM. This also could cause unwanted oscillation or spurious squealing. Since I initially tested this on a clean lab supply there is no electrical noise and the AM radio portion worked with the spectrum analyzer.

Continued in next post.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #8 ·
Radio Repair Part II - Continued

Next I'll examine main power supply filter capacitor. It's the big can that has three capacitors in it. They are circled in red.

Schematic Font Rectangle Parallel Engineering


Motor vehicle Circuit component Electronic engineering Electronic instrument Electrical wiring


Here's one cap in the can. Now this is the first time the handheld has really indicated trouble. All three capacitors in this can are rated at 500 uF.

Here's the other two sections:

Motor vehicle Audio equipment Circuit component Electrical wiring Gas


not good.

Circuit component Motor vehicle Electrical wiring Audio equipment Electronic engineering


and also not good.

Since we know that an old failing electrolytic will read much higher on a handheld, this thing must be nearly expired.

Electronic instrument Electronic engineering Audio equipment Electricity Engineering


Yuppers, that's pretty darn low at only 8.8uF out of 500 uF. That's only about 1.8% of capacity.

Audio equipment Electronic instrument Electronic engineering Electronic device Machine


This is showing an ESR of 143 ohms. For this kind of application I would want to see a capacitor with a 1/2 ohm or less ESR.

I won't bore you testing the other two sections as they are all about the same condition. I'm trying to impart a feel of what to expect.

With this input power supply filter being nearly dead, you would hear every electrical noise in your car over the speakers on AM or FM. You'd hear the ignition, turn signals, blower motor, etc as a symptom and perhaps even the alternator whine.

There's only 4 more electrolytic's to check.

Music Rectangle Font Parallel Sheet music


The ones circled in pink must have some life left in them as they couple the audio on the L & R amplifiers, if these were dead the radio would produce no sound, maybe some hiss from the output transistors cranked all the way up, but that's about it.

Here's how they checked out.

Electrical wiring Electronic engineering Audio equipment Electronic instrument Circuit component


The handheld is measuring 3uF and the capacitor is rated at 2uF. On the surface that seems pretty good, albeit high.

Audio equipment Musical instrument Audio receiver Musical instrument accessory Electronic device


The bridge isn't that far off either.

Sooooooo are these good or...........

Audio equipment Audio receiver Electronic device Electronic instrument Electronic engineering


No. Not even close. 172 ohms is bad, when these should be around 1-2 ohms ESR for this size and voltage rating of an electrolytic capacitor.

But now let me throw you a further curve ball. Up to this point I've been checking ESR and capacitance. I've mentioned that the LCR bridge uses frequency to measure capacitance, but I never mentioned what that frequency is.

Till now.

Continued in next post.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
Radio Repair Part II - Continued

The industry standard is 120Hz. Why 120Hz... because the North American power grid operates at 60Hz and capacitors used after a full wave bridge rectifier will see 120 Hz pulses of current, which is a common application. My HP LCR bridge can measure at 120Hz, 1kHz and 10kHz. Now healthy capacitors will operate near their rated capacitance (usually around 1% variance) at higher frequencies, but what about old failing capacitors....

Let's take a look. This is the audio coupling capacitor again.

Circuit component Electrical wiring Electronic engineering Audio equipment Engineering


On 120Hz, it's measuring close enough to 2.6 uF.

Electronic instrument Audio receiver Audio equipment Electronic engineering Electrical wiring


At 1kHz it's measuring 1.7uF

Circuit component Electronic engineering Audio receiver Electrical wiring Audio equipment


And at 10kHz it's only 0.9uF.

Where these are used in the circuit, if you change the capacitance or resistance, you effectively are changing the allowable pass band of certain frequencies, just like what an equalizer does. Now imagine an equalizer that changes automatically on its own with frequency of the audio coming through it. It would sound terrible. Well that's what's happening here with these old capacitors. Whilst they work, they sonic quality is severely degraded.

The other audio coupling capacitor is in similar condition so no need to show that.

The last group of electrolytic's to check are the ones circled in orange.

Music Rectangle Font Parallel Sheet music


These in this circuit function as emitter bypass capacitors. In other words they shunt the AC audio signal past the biasing network of resistance allow the proper quiescent DC biasing voltages to keep the output transistors operating near their ideal current conditions.

If these capacitors start to go open then the gain falls off severely in the audio amp. Which is exactly what this radio was displaying when I powered it up as you had to nearly max the volume control out to hear normal listening level. With that I already expected these to be dead or nearly dead.

Motor vehicle Circuit component Electronic instrument Electrical wiring Hood


I'll be honest I wasn't expecting that. I mean they are just a pile of bones dead.

Musical instrument Electronic instrument Audio equipment Electronic engineering Musical instrument accessory


The LCR bridge says 0.0076 uF and they are rated at 1000 uF. I guarantee that tiny capacitance is from the test leads and not the capacitor.

This is the one time the handheld and the bridge were in complete agreement.

Electronic instrument Audio equipment Electronic engineering Electronic device Electronic component


Holy cow it's no longer a capacitor but a 550k Ohm resistor.

The other one was no better and certainly no worse. I mean 0 is 0.

That concludes the learning curve on electrolytic capacitors. I know I covered a great deal (and still left a great amount out), but hopefully some will find this useful.

Last item on the bucket list was the driver transistor for the stereo lamp. The resistor in series with the emitter checked fine so I did a quick test with a pocket checker.

Gas Font Machine Transparency Metal


Now this can also be like the handheld capacitance meter. You need to be aware of the equipments limitations and how exactly it's testing the part. On the surface this says it's just fine.

I have a curve tracer, but that's a bit much to get into, if you thought simple electrolytics was a complex subject I could drown you with bi-polar solid state theory and applications. I will say this, these early epoxy domed transistors are notorious for failure with age. And this transistor is indeed bad, regardless of what the tester says.

I think that's enough for now. On the next round, I'll cover testing the new parts, assembling and testing the radio to see how well I did to correct the first round of problems and see if any new problems are now detectable.

More to come.

Cheers
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Hello DXL, hope you are well!

Thanks again for he detailed - and entertaining - restoration write-ups. I'm finding this one especially interesting since I spent my first semester of college taking electronics technology courses, before moving into telecommunications and eventually IT. BTW that is an impressive array of test equipment you have at your disposal - do you do this for a living?

Since you seem to be so good at so many different pursuits, I'm curious if you have advanced education or training in any specific field? Or are you just naturally talented?
Hello kbuhagiar,

How are you doing? I am doing well, thank you for asking. I am happy you are finding this thread interesting. I am trying to balance a fine line of giving enough information for someone wanting to try something similar, but at the same time not overwhelm someone with too much information.

I really do not do vintage repair for a living. There simply is no money in it as no one is going to spend for the labour to have something old fixed properly. I have about 40 solid hours into that radio and that's not including letting it play for a few hours a day and checking in on it. Very few people would pay lab rate to have the radio fixed properly.

I have a bachelors degree but none further. I did have a unique job for several years as a metrologist in a NIST comparable environment and that imparted a really good background in accuracy and testing. Then I worked as an automotive testing and design engineer for awhile. In those jobs it was sink or swim, there's no mentoring. You have to find answers on your own and think out of the box most days. In the automotive world it's sink or swim, no life vest.

Now I do have an insatiable desire for knowledge. My better half and I have collected over 400 hardcover books on general engineering subjects. Many of them are older books; from the 60's all the way to modern day. I will say this there is much more information in the older books than what is imparted in newer texts. I'd go so far as it's a dumbing down of American education. You couldn't pay me to go back to college.

I do like to read and experiment for myself. Now I wouldn't mind teaching it, that's for sure.

Anyway I hope you are having fun :)

Cheers
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #12 ·
Radio Repair Part III

This section will deal with the replacement parts.

On the topic of the stereo lamp driver transistor.

Gas Jewellery Circle Nickel Metal


The old epoxy domed one was indeed faulty and I found a suitable one from my parts selection. All these transistors in this radio are silicon and there are no germanium ones. Now the Sams schematic is in error and shows a couple of them as germanium but they are silicon, so you can of have to use instinct to find the errors.

Germanium transistors will have a Base to Emitter forward voltage drop around 0.2 volts. Silicon will have around 0.6 volts.

Gas Font Machine Transparency Metal


Just to rehash, this is the old lamp driver and according to this it's ok. But it's not testing under a heavy load and that's where the problem lies. In this case it's only 6.1 mA, that lamp even with the 10 ohm resistor will draw well over 100 mA. A curve tracer will confirm the collector current falls off under a heavier load.

Gas Technology Electronic device Machine Audio equipment


This one tests nearly the same. This kind of tester is fine for catching dead devices, it doesn't do a comprehensive test. Again it's all about knowing exactly how your test equipment operates.

Pliers Vision care Wood Eyewear Electrical wiring


On the topic of other replacement parts, in this case capacitors, with the current supply shortage, finding the perfect part replacement was a bit of a challenge as the major parts houses I listed earlier were really skint on inventory and I didn't want to wait 16-30 weeks, in this case I settled for electrically critical criteria but had to settle in some cases for case size or just pricing. In this case these capacitors replace the audio coupling caps from earlier. These were over 7 dollars each.

I will not bore you with more capacitor testing pictures. The handheld meter does agree with the LCR bridge on the new capacitors. My previous pictures were to demonstrate how easily it is to be fooled by readings with failing parts.

Fluid Wood Writing implement Office supplies Pen


These are to replace the main power supply filter capacitor can. Here's where you have to think out of the box a bit. There are the equivalent of three capacitors in that can. Finding a replacement can that fits in the radio will be next to impossible. The only multisection can capacitors that are still being made are mostly reproductions for old tube gear and those are physically much larger and higher voltage.

About replacement capacitor and voltage ratings. Whilst you never want to put a lower rated capacitor in place of a higher rated voltage one, on the flip-side you do not want to put a really high rated voltage capacitor in place of a lower rated one. The reason is electrolytic capacitors occasionally need to 'reform'. When an electrolytic capacitor is dormant for long periods the dielectric insulator starts to break down in some areas. When you apply voltage to a dormant electrolytic capacitor it can heal itself. But you need to be ~1/2-3/4 of the rated voltage to do so.

So you wouldn't want a 100 volt capacitor for the 16 volt filter capacitor sort of thing. Just something to keep in mind.

Circuit component Hardware programmer Audio equipment Passive circuit component Computer hardware


Here's how I mounted them. This worked really well. I used low acid RTV to effectively glue the three together. This makes them very stout and resistant to vibration.

You want to use low acid RTV, typically the Ultra series RTV (in this case Ultra Black) are low acid. Some other RTV's cure by releasing acetic acid and the acid will eat through some materials and you never want to use that in electronic equipment. Basically if the RTV has a strong odor, don't use it as glue.

Passive circuit component Circuit component Hardware programmer Electronic instrument Electronic engineering


OK, so I've replaced the electrolytic's on these boards and I reinstalled the AM board.

Passive circuit component Table Circuit component Hardware programmer Motor vehicle


The balance control is added. This was cleaned with Deoxit.

Circuit component Hardware programmer Electronic component Electronic engineering Computer hardware


Cleaned and installed the front support plate.

Electronic engineering Electrical wiring Engineering Gas Machine


This rheostat is the stereo separation adjustment. It's adjustable from the exterior of the radio.

Continued in next post.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
Radio Repair Part III - Continued

Passive circuit component Circuit component Hardware programmer Electronic instrument Electronic engineering


That's all put back together and it's starting to look less hopeless and more like a radio.

Computer Circuit component Passive circuit component Hardware programmer Electronic engineering


All that's left is the volume/tone control assembly and audio amplifier sections.

Wood Twig Bumper Electrical wiring Gas


But first, the old wire is, well, old, and needs to go. It just cracks if you bend it on a tight radius.

Electrical wiring Electronic engineering Circuit component Gas Electricity


With that I added new GXL wire to the radio. Now I did add a remote wire as well for the other part of the sound system enhancements.

Electrical wiring Networking cables Gas Cable Electronic component


And for some reason the general illumination lamp wire was cut on this radio. Why on earth would someone cut that. I mean the wire is old and needs to be replaced, but I don't get why hack it.

Rectangle Wall Font Gas Space


Anyway they do sell the lamp terminal crimps like the factory for making your own new wire assemblies.

Electrical wiring Cable Networking cables Gas Wire


Much better. Now I do eventually use a soft white bright LED. So this incandescent doesn't hang around for too long.

Passive circuit component Circuit component Capacitor Resistor Cylinder


These were the last of the electrolytics to replace.

Circuit component Hardware programmer Electronic engineering Electronic component Electrical wiring


At this point you'll have to forgive me as I was so engrossed on reassembly I forgot about the camera. I do pick up again after realizing I'm SUPPOSED to take pictures. :unsure:

Here's the events that transpired without pictures. I powered up the radio driving just 8 ohm monitor speakers and what an improvement. At just 1/4 volume it's really loud in the lab. AM is alive albeit not really sensitive as it should be, I'm counting on it just needing an alignment after I was poking around mending that IF transformer.

FM works well, the stereo lamp is bright on stations, so that's done. I hit all my initial problems and they are remedied.

However, 3 new problems were now evident.

1.) The right side channel is noticeably louder than the left.
2.) The sound is really flat, tone control works, but being just a tone control it doesn't address the noticeably flat spectrum.
3.) The left side speaker sometimes doesn't work and if I press on the output transistor is works. That's an easy one and we'll tackle that last as I'll have to replace the output transistors.

Continued in next post.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #14 ·
Radio Repair Part III - Continued

To address the first problem, I set up the stereo generator with both test tones on so the input signal was equal on both speakers. Then with a steady signal I took some measurements to figure out why the right side was louder. I could be partly the stereo decoder, it could be the volume/tone controls, and or it could be the amplifiers as the gain may be higher in one than the other.

Didn't take long to find the problem.

Handwriting Rectangle Font Slope Schematic


These are ac voltages from the test tones entering the volume/tone control circuitry. To make sure the amplifiers weren't dragging the signals down I removed the disc capacitors with the red X through them. From this you can see at the balance control I only have a R & L difference of ~ 1%. At the input to the amplifier section (out of the volume/tone controls) I have roughly 45% difference between R & L. Here's the problem area.

I removed all the film capacitors from this area to check for leakages, although film capacitors rarely fail. I checked the resistors and they all checked ok. Although some of the film capacitors were crumbling. So they will get replaced because they are physically falling apart.

The problem was the actual volume controls themselves. Das ist nicht sehr gut. That's not good because they are very specialized controls for this particular radio design and not something that can be just purchased.

Looking at the schematic you can see the end to end resistance is supposed to be 225 k Ohms with a tap at 75 k Ohms.

Here's my results.

Right side volume control potentiometer:

Full range Ohms: 319 k (supposed to be 225 k)
Tap to audio source end Ohms: 242 k (supposed to be 150 k)
Tap to ground end Ohms: 77 k (supposed to be 75 k)

Left side volume control potentiometer:

Full range Ohms: 211 k (supposed to be 225 k)
Tap to audio source end Ohms: 131 k (supposed to be 150 k)
Tap to ground end Ohms: 81 k (supposed to be 75 k)

So you can see if you add the tap to one end and the tap to the other end resistance that should total close to the full range ohms of the volume control.

Lets have a better look at the volume control and where the tap is at.

Circuit component Gas Passive circuit component Electronic component Auto part


You can see the four stacks of controls amalgamated into one unit. The front two sections are the tone for the R & L side, the rear two sections are the volume controls for the R & L side. You can see the tap connection atop and to the one side. The wiper and end contacts are on the bottom on all 4 sections.

I do have the spare radio so it might be a donor candidate. With that I took it apart to measure its controls.

Passive circuit component Circuit component Resistor Hardware programmer Electronic instrument


Well that took bit of time, but here's the parts radio results.

Right side volume control potentiometer:

Full range Ohms: 192 k (supposed to be 225 k)
Tap to audio source end Ohms: 136 k (supposed to be 150 k)
Tap to ground end Ohms: 57 k (supposed to be 75 k)

Left side volume control potentiometer:

Full range Ohms: 260 k (supposed to be 225 k)
Tap to audio source end Ohms: 1621 k (supposed to be 150 k)
Tap to ground end Ohms: 99 k (supposed to be 75 k)

I think the parts radio is actually worse off.

Well..... :poop:!

Here's where you have to think out of the box again. I have accepted I'll probably never find a decent donor part so I have to work with what I have. What I can do is try to normalize both R & L potentiometers to the least resistance portions of each other.

Let me explain that, since each volume control is divided (unequally) into two sections by the tap, I can focus on the resistance from the tap to the audio source end connection on both volume controls and whomever has the higher resistance will be reduced to match the lower resistance of the other volume control. And you do the same with the other side of the tap.

A diagram may be better:
Brown Handwriting Wood Rectangle Font


Here I've drawn both volume control potentiometers atop the page. The blue ink represents the measured resistances of the two sections of each volume control.

Let's look at the lower section from the tap to the bottom terminal. On the right it's currently 77 k Ohms and on the left it's currently 81 k Ohms. The idea is to reduce the 81 k Ohms to 77 k Ohms by adding a parallel resistance. Then you do the same for the top portion. In the end both volume controls will measure the same across their terminals. Now this isn't exact as wiper in the potentiometer will not track exactly, but it will be close enough to improve this situation.

The equations at the bottom are just simple parallel resistance calculations to determine the extra resistors I need to add to each volume control.

After adding the resistors this is the new measurements based on % of volume control.

Font Handwriting Paper Number Paper product


Pardon my handwriting. Aft and Fore refer to the volume controls as positioned in the radio from the front to back. You can see the L & R now track each other pretty decently till about 63% of travel on the volume knob. And after running the radio, anything past 50% is just distortion anyway and bloody loud as the amplifiers are clipping.

So this will work just fine.

Next I'll tackle the second problem of why is the audio so flat. Looking at the broader picture as in not just the radio, but the whole system as installed in the car, I am not taking into account the original type speakers used. Chances are they would have been paper cone high efficiency speakers (greater than 100 db per 1 watt at 1 meter). New speakers today aren't that efficient, mainly because there's no need to make them efficient as audio power is aplenty these days. But in the vacuum tube/valve era and early transistorized radios power output was expensive and heavy, so it made sense to make efficient speakers to make the most out of the little the radios were able to produce in terms of power output.

It is very possible the original speakers greatly accentuated the mids and highs and what seems like a flat response to me using a high quality monitor type speaker isn't what you would have heard in the car when the entire system is considered.

That begs the question, is this flat response built in or a fault?

Only one way to find out and that is model the volume/tone controls in SPICE and run an AC analysis and look at the frequency response.

Handwriting Rectangle Font Slope Schematic


I have the original circuit here. Just need to draw this in SPICE.

Product Rectangle Slope Font Line


For those wondering what this is about, SPICE is circuit emulator. It allows you to test your circuits under different conditions to see how well they work before you even build a prototype. It's handy.

SPICE stands for Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis, although you don't have to use integrated circuits, you can model discrete components as well like this simple volume and tone control.

The program I am using is freeware and is it's call Quc's. I have a couple computers loaded with Ubuntu on them and Quc's is in the Ubuntu software store for free. Just search download in the Linux free app store. Last time I checked Quc's did not run natively on Mac OS. You'll have to use Wine to run Quc's on a Mac. It does run natively in Windows as well. Although the last time I used Windows the operating system was XP 2nd edition. I probably wouldn't recognize the latest edition of Windows if I tripped over it and believe me I'm grateful. :geek:

Ok, back to the simulation. Here's how this is setup. On the input I am applying a 1V AC signal on the (Audio In) that varies from 0 to 15 kHz and it'll plot the output at (Audio Out).

In this circuit rendition, you'll notice I have the tone control set at full base (full anti-clockwise) and volume at 1/3.

Rectangle Slope Font Line Parallel


This is the audio spectrum sent to the amplifiers in the radio. From about 3 - 15 kHz it's pretty darn flat. Let's focus on the lower end and enhance that.

Rectangle Slope Font Line Parallel


So in full bass setting that's exactly what it's doing, allowing more bass signals to get through and attenuating the rest of the spectrum. Still pretty flat otherwise.

Product Rectangle Slope Font Parallel


Here I've set the tone control in the middle. Let's see the result.

Rectangle Slope Font Line Parallel


The bass stays more or less the same but the rest of the spectrum is elevated. So this would boost the mids and highs together. Still pretty flat.

Continued in next post.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #15 ·
Radio Repair Part III - Continued

Product Rectangle Slope Font Parallel


Now I've set the tone control to full treble (max clockwise). Let's see what this does.

Rectangle Font Line Slope Parallel


Well all it really did was attenuate the bass. Looking a little closer.

Rectangle Slope Font Parallel Pattern


It just killed the low bass chiefly.

And this is exactly what I'm hearing in the lab using the monitor speakers. This simulation proves a couple things.

1.) This is how the radio was designed and is not a fault.
2.) The cars original factory speakers were such that they probably further enhanced mid and highs for the tone/bass control to really only affect the low frequency range.
3.) Since even if you had the factory speakers, they would be so dried out and decrepit by now you'd have to use an aftermarket speaker which more than likely wouldn't have the sonic characteristic as the originals, so you would need to use an external equalizer and amplifier.

Spoiler:
The upgraded total sound system is in fact using equalizers, amplifiers, fader control, antenna injection of ancillary audio input and very probably reverberation along with this 1968 head unit. But the head unit must work extremely well first otherwise all the rest is meaningless if you put a garbage signal into it.

Light Electrical wiring Circuit component Electronic engineering Computer hardware


Back to the head unit. I replaced the disintegrating film capacitors on the volume control board with Nichicon film capacitors (yellow ones).

Circuit component Table Passive circuit component Electronic instrument Electrical wiring


And here we are back together..... again, for another test. This time we are going to use one of the equalizers and amplifier that's going in the car. Now in order to do that. I need to convert the low output impedance of the radio back to a higher impedance to feed into the equalizer. So I have two line matching transformers, one for each channel.

I temporary put the front plastic cover on this radio, I will use the plastic cover and knobs from the radio in the XL as those are in really nice shape. I put the cover on, because the LED back light is otherwise really bright.

Electrical wiring Electricity Electronic engineering Computer hardware Circuit component


It's messy but it's working really well at this point and it still needs an electrical alignment and the power output transistors changed.

Both left and right speakers track in volume up to stupid loud levels, so that's fixed and of course the EQ corrects the flat response for these speakers.

Since the proof is always in the pudding. I offer the pudding. :)

Here's a video of it playing at this point. http://galaxieworks.com/sites/forum_videos/1968 Radio Play.mp4

Mind you I'm using my still camera and it's limited video feature. Your playback may vary in quality, but in person it sounds pretty darn good for once beat up and left for dead radio.

More to come.

Cheers
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #16 ·
Speakers - Rear

I thought I would take a break from the radio portion, I know it's boring to many, and focus on the speaker situation. My particular XL just has the rear speakers and none in the door. The plan is to add the door speakers and I think I've got a decent solution to that. The goal is to look as either factory or 60's era as possible. But for now, I'll focus on the rear speakers.

Here's what's in the car now.

Hood Automotive tire Automotive lighting Automotive design Automotive exterior


Grille Automotive tire Automotive lighting Synthetic rubber Automotive design


They look very old and very paper. They sound terrible, but the current 1968 AM-FM stereo radio is to largely blame.

Plus lest not forgot the exquisite installation someone did on these in the past.

Hood Motor vehicle Automotive tire Bumper Wood


Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh brother.

Motor vehicle Automotive tire Tread Vehicle Automotive design


Good grief, what a joke. Well I had enough of a laugh over these time for these to go in the trash, where they belong.

Automotive tire Automotive lighting Wood Grey Audio equipment


The paper just disintegrated when you touch it.

Circuit component Watch Font Computer hardware Circle


This is the back side of them. They look like some 1990's Circuit City bargain line.

Since the amplifier I am going to be using is a 4 x 50 watt rms, I decided to pick a 6x9 that was similarly rated.

Audio equipment Wood Material property Gas Electronic instrument


I bought these.

Font Road surface Wood Rectangle Gas


At least on paper these seem to be a good match for the amplifier.

Automotive tire Car subwoofer Vehicle audio Electronic instrument Camera accessory


Camera accessory Audio equipment Electronic device Cameras & optics Auto part


Just to keep in mind on this sound system I am putting together, I am going for quality not over the top quantity.

Continued in next post
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
924 Posts
Discussion Starter · #17 ·
Speakers - Rear - Continued

Now for grills I wanted some more 60's looking than a garish looking modern grill. So I found these for a 60's Mustang.

Automotive lighting Hood Motor vehicle Grille Automotive radiator part


These look the part.

Brown Automotive lighting Sound box Electronic instrument Audio equipment


Just a compare and contrast. Yuppers the right one looks like it belongs in the car.

Liquid Light Grille Fluid Plastic bottle


Now the Mustang reproduction grills are all metal, no cheap plastic, so I'm really digging them. Plus it has studs which makes installing the speakers even easier as I don't need 20 foot arms to reach around and hold a screwdriver from the boot in the car where I'm securing the nut. I used Locktight on the studs.

Hood Grille Eyewear Bag Automotive lighting


However Rockford Fosgate has quality problems already in that their 6x9 holes are slightly off. I thought maybe it was the reproduction Mustang grills but the old speaker mounting holes are right on target. So I had to file all the mounting holes on the new speakers a bit. More wonderful aftermarket mantra "nothing works as intended".

Automotive tire Hood Motor vehicle Automotive design Vehicle


Easy peasy to mount with these grills.

Motor vehicle Vehicle Car Automotive tire Hood


Hood Grille Vehicle Car Motor vehicle


I am happy with the looks, although the previous owner who installed black carpeting over the package shelf hardboard should have gave the carpet a haircut first. :rolleyes:

I can't really judge how these sound yet, because, well, they sound exactly the same as the decrepit old speakers. You know your radio is in dire need of repair when that's the case.

More to come.

Cheers
 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
Top